tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post5374822326104646260..comments2023-10-24T10:23:42.618+02:00Comments on palingates: PALINGATES HIT A NERVE - LETTER FROM HARPER COLLINS! - UPDATE!reginahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04311352941909440862noreply@blogger.comBlogger393125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-32894012175742648592009-11-17T05:11:41.465+01:002009-11-17T05:11:41.465+01:00Anonymous said...
The release of Dr. CBJ'...Anonymous said...<br /><br /> The release of Dr. CBJ's medical disclosure for VP candidate Sarah Palin (did not?) reveal any miscarriages? If it had, that would have been to SP's advantage as it would have increased her image as a Madonna, who wasn't using contraceptive, and who wanted more children. It would have really pulled the emotional strings of her base. Having miscarriages would have furthered her appeal to pro-lifers everywhere.<br /><br /> So why didn't she allow this info to come out back then?<br />****************<br />Maybe b/c <b> They weren't miscarriages!</b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-9620572422989817352009-11-16T21:56:34.280+01:002009-11-16T21:56:34.280+01:00As many of you are aware, various online and old s...As many of you are aware, various online and old school publications have been fact-checking the book, Going Rogue whose authorship is attributed to Sarah Palin, former Governor of Alaska. You may also be aware, that several people who were written about in this book were factually misrepresented and believe their reputation and good standing in the community have been damaged. <br /><br />As a True Patriot who cherishes my first amendments RIGHTs, I have exercised my Freedom of Speech and have emailed Mr. Goff of HarperCollins the following:<br /><br />-=-=-=-=-=-<br />"Wouldn't it be ironic if Ms. Palin went ROGUE on the book tour and diverted from the carefully scripted sound bites that HC and the media advisers have so carefully crafted? Steve Schmidt was very wise to advise Ms. Palin to stick to the script.<br /><br />Going rogue, of course, brings some very real risks. Including, but not limited, to actionable events. <br /><br />Controversy may sell books, but it also incites those who have been libeled to seek lawyers."<br />-=-=-=-=-=-=<br /><br />In my opinion, allowing Sarah Palin to speak without a script could only further anger and potentially damage a number of people.<br /><br />For my own part, I will not be buying this book nor will I borrow and read it. Furthermore, in protest of the poor journalistic principles (and lack thereof) I am also boycotting all other HarperCollins publications.<br /><br />In Alaska, the ground is rumbling and the steam is rising and it's not coming from Augustine.a REAL Patriotnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-69996156234995310672009-11-16T21:25:15.050+01:002009-11-16T21:25:15.050+01:00Jesse C., how much would it cost to have you do PR...Jesse C., how much would it cost to have you do PR for my blog? You boosted the traffic here so well! What are your current rates?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-74829045357481849372009-11-16T21:04:42.093+01:002009-11-16T21:04:42.093+01:00Hahaha
Gawker is now posting some of the pages:
...Hahaha<br /><br />Gawker is now posting some of the pages: <br /><a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gawker/full/~3/Mom2rxttSrI/sarah-palins-goin-rogue-an-american-tail-also-a-review" rel="nofollow">An FU to HC, from Gawker</a>Sunshine1970https://www.blogger.com/profile/08408547699605764239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-25758137297096643692009-11-16T21:01:47.269+01:002009-11-16T21:01:47.269+01:00Patrick, I wonder what Mr. Curvers would have to s...Patrick, I wonder what Mr. Curvers would have to say about your lying? <br /><br />You've got an ego boost from apparantly breaking copyright law. Now just don't let it get to your head. I still await your indisputable proof.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-20068309283759802842009-11-16T19:54:07.467+01:002009-11-16T19:54:07.467+01:00I find it so fascinating that $arah spent 8 pages ...I find it so fascinating that $arah spent 8 pages bashing Katie Couric and yet goes into NO detail about all the allegations and proof that she is not the biological mother to Trig. She spent no time being upset about Palingates, Palindeception, or Breepalin? It seems her silence on this shows shows us this is the truth. S.H.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-29879976157135349242009-11-16T19:01:11.694+01:002009-11-16T19:01:11.694+01:00The release of Dr. CBJ's medical disclosure fo...The release of Dr. CBJ's medical disclosure for VP candidate Sarah Palin (did not?) reveal any miscarriages? If it had, that would have been to SP's advantage as it would have increased her image as a Madonna, who wasn't using contraceptive, and who wanted more children. It would have really pulled the emotional strings of her base. Having miscarriages would have furthered her appeal to pro-lifers everywhere.<br /><br />So why didn't she allow this info to come out back then?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-293413157650755502009-11-16T18:28:30.072+01:002009-11-16T18:28:30.072+01:00Dangerous,
I have nothing against you personally,...Dangerous,<br /><br />I have nothing against you personally, but let me say straight away that Willow-theories are NOT appreciated here on this blog.Patrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06342444888520052108noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-128100718371334492009-11-16T18:23:54.588+01:002009-11-16T18:23:54.588+01:00Dangerous? THE Dangerous?! Where have you been?!...Dangerous? THE Dangerous?! Where have you been?!Leadfoothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00069685080114509777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-10959210754901499842009-11-16T16:56:10.745+01:002009-11-16T16:56:10.745+01:00Lots to discuss.
First, I would not have taken th...Lots to discuss.<br /><br />First, I would not have taken the letter from the HC lawyer too seriouly. I would have countered with a reply saying that the posting constituted fair use, and asking the lawyer to please explain the basis for seeking to control such use. But I don't blame Patrick for taking it down either.<br /><br />If accurately quoted, the key aspect of all of SP's statements in her book is that they are UNCORROBORATED. She "secretly" bought a pregnancy test? In typical fashion, everything from her is "take my word for it" with enough detail to be plausible, but not nearly enough to allow for corroboration. Since she didn't actually write the book, it's just a work of fiction as told by Sarah Palin. And we know Sarah Palin tells stories.<br /><br />The white-out story is, of course, nonsense. She doesn't reproduce the document in question. But if what she admits is true, there is a document out there that states she had an abortion. If SHE was the one who used the white out (later intending to release the document), that would give her a motive to fake a pregnancy with a fetus known to have DS in order to inoculate herself from the earlier procedure.<br /><br />Nothing has really changed in the central quest, except she continues her pattern of unsupported, self-serving drivel. She needs to be cross-examined about:<br /><br />a) Why she decided to deceive everyone about the Trig pregnancy since it would necessarily become public anyway;<br />b) Why, if her water-breaking and contractions were not serious enough for an exam before the Wild Ride, she went straight to Mat-su Hospital, the farthest possible location where she could be checked;<br />c) Why she has never produced any indisputable evidence that she was pregnant with Trig, although such a high-risk pregnancy would produce a paper trail a mile long.<br /><br />I doubt any interviewer will ask her those hard questions, despite the invitation her book tour presents. <br /><br />Until we get such proof, I'm calling Sarah Palin a liar.<br /><br />Dan<b><i>Daniel Archangel</i></b>https://www.blogger.com/profile/07084833652283692862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-71642233517593249762009-11-16T15:49:08.909+01:002009-11-16T15:49:08.909+01:00Anonyomous at 0956:
That's Zaki trying to be ...Anonyomous at 0956:<br /><br />That's Zaki trying to be cute, showing the world once again what a great reporter he is.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-14776186535318144902009-11-16T15:35:58.154+01:002009-11-16T15:35:58.154+01:00Pro Choice Grandma & Armchair Jane, You are tw...Pro Choice Grandma & Armchair Jane, You are two of my favorite posters, because you make such wise comments. Thanks very much!Karenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12161438430474281610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-54367400544642955952009-11-16T15:29:07.300+01:002009-11-16T15:29:07.300+01:00ProChoiceGrandma,
Thanks for the shoutout! I am a ...ProChoiceGrandma,<br />Thanks for the shoutout! I am a big fan of yours, and as always you are getting to the central point here, regarding Sarah's hypocrisy and her feeling that she is entitled to try to interfere with other women who need to make hard choices.ArmchairJanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06227611891127796064noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-82634171855045351182009-11-16T15:15:33.638+01:002009-11-16T15:15:33.638+01:00EOY and many others, I agree. Sarah bringing up t...EOY and many others, I agree. Sarah bringing up the issue of Sarah’s previous abortion, er, “miscarriage”, without any previously known mention of it anywhere, seems to be a pre-emptive strike against a forthcoming exposure. But really, Sarah, wite-out? That may pass as acceptable by her ignorant minions, but it did not pass the sniff test by all of the intelligent people here. I believe Armchairjane in the previous thread was the first to point out that miscarriage is not a procedure, but abortion IS a procedure. By using wite-out to cover “abortion” and over-writing it with “miscarriage” instead of the D&C (or (D&E) procedure, it clearly shows that it was not a medical office that made that change.<br />It almost appears that Sarah made that change before hubby saw the statement. And if it was a billing statement from a doctor’s office, that seems to indicate a cash transaction, not through the insurance company. If you want to keep something secret, pay cash and don’t go through the insurance company, right Sarah? <br />And Sarah, having an abortion does not make you a bad person or condemn you to hell. For whatever reason, that was your choice to make that decision in your life. But your hypocrisy in condemning others and pressing for laws to outlaw abortion and deny other women a choice in their private lives is outrageous.ProChoiceGrandmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02136221602277832043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-90182720787305615162009-11-16T15:04:41.407+01:002009-11-16T15:04:41.407+01:00Here' MY take on the med bill. It did say ...Here' MY take on the med bill. It did say 'abortion' because she had one (isent that around the time of brad Hanson?). She told toddy she miscarried. He's not the sharperts tool in the shed, and believed her. Bill comes, it says the truth. She whites it out (although most doctors and hosptials use computers since about the mid 80's to do the billing). She goes to her old college typewriter and tyes in 'misscarriage'. Toddy is none the wiser, she saves some face. However, she also knows this might get out, so is doing her pre emptive stike. <br />I'm sure HC will now come after me, a private citizen with a private opinion now that I've let the cat out of the bag.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-7856040266969800252009-11-16T15:03:45.290+01:002009-11-16T15:03:45.290+01:00Yep, got to agree with Eye on you...
she is tellin...Yep, got to agree with Eye on you...<br />she is telling "HER story" so when it comes out...that she had a abortion, she will have her side presented. Someone already mentioned that a Writer stumbled on this info while researching a book about her. There are two that I know of...Geoffrey Dunn and Joe McGinnis recently in Alaska researching their books, very recently Joe was still there middle of Oct.<br />There is no need to even mention this "abortion" oopsie typo white out mistake! And her other "miscarriage"! Someone's got the goods on her and she is banking the bots are too stupid to know, about how white out isn't allowed in ins/med. billing/dr. office and bots are too stupid to know a miscarriage is a condition not a procedure, and Toad probably didn't know either. That is why she is trying to get this blog to sit down and shut up! But WE WON'T SARAH! SUCK IT UP BUTTERCUP! You had 1 possibly 2 abortions and its going to come out!<br />See Andrew Halcro today? Better dig 2 graves, lol!crystalwolf aka caligrlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-63349689695441186562009-11-16T15:01:04.463+01:002009-11-16T15:01:04.463+01:00NEW POST UP!!NEW POST UP!!Patrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06342444888520052108noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-64234536338910245602009-11-16T14:53:34.495+01:002009-11-16T14:53:34.495+01:00Regina & Patrick... hope the blog had record n...Regina & Patrick... hope the blog had record numbers of visitors.<br /><br />The fake baby story needs to spread to more people.<br /><br />For some reason I think the Daily Dish will do more posts on this soon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-88355811213517327542009-11-16T14:20:47.918+01:002009-11-16T14:20:47.918+01:00Personally I think that the whole point of the mis...Personally I think that the whole point of the miscarriage/abortion mention in the book should be to ask "why" it was brought up.<br /><br />There was absolutely no reason to bring it up. Unless she spoke in great detail about each of her pregnancies, then what would be the point of her bringing this information up in her book, sharing it with everyone. <br /><br />She does it for a reason, and the question is what is the reason she felt the need to make this information known. <br /><br />Is she worried about someone revealing this information and it being damaging? Is she worried that the truth will come out about an abortion and she is revising the story before it comes out so she can claim she has already told people about what "really" happened, in an attempt to lessen the damage it might do to her "pro-life" cred? <br /><br />Make no mistake, this was offered up for a specific reason, especially considering how little was offered about her medical history in that letter released for the presidential election.EyeOnYouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08663121057208151750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-79056923344710245122009-11-16T13:53:01.995+01:002009-11-16T13:53:01.995+01:00To Susan in MD, the situation as SP described it w...To Susan in MD, the situation as SP described it was not a spontaneous abortion. Her story is that the fetus was not alive; she could have waited for it to expel but chose to have a D&C. As everyone agrees, a miscarriage is not a procedure. <br /><br />The questions about the CBJ letter are important. Even if what Sarah is now saying were true, the letter would be deceptive on its face. Aim some fire at CBJ; she deserves it for keeping this hoax secret.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-71710858769589919722009-11-16T13:49:58.636+01:002009-11-16T13:49:58.636+01:00Sorry for all the typos above. Did not proofreader...Sorry for all the typos above. Did not proofreader . Now posting from train. Cracking up about slipping a note to her doctor. How high school is that? She is so stuck in a previous developmental level.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-31576299449431031212009-11-16T13:15:41.827+01:002009-11-16T13:15:41.827+01:00Susa in MD:
I did bring your one poit up - on Sat ...Susa in MD:<br />I did bring your one poit up - on Sat I think, about the leeters "G" and "P" which are a standard part of any women's health istory. G is the number of times you are pregnant and P is the number of times you gave live birth. I think this is a big easons Sarahs med recs were never releaed: her numbers won't match he rtories. She wsnts us to believe she is a G7P5, but maybe is a G6P4, but who really knows. Her official story now is G7P5.<br />Too much wite out would be needed to to amend her records which is why they were never released. Also, too who knows what else - mentsl health issues?- may be in there.<br />And as for CBJ and her letter, the fact that two miscarriages are not mentioned when the focus of the letter was mainly on Trig's birth - speaks VOLUMES. And makes CBJ look more the fool for giving permission to fly on a plane.<br />This is so much fun to watch the truth unfold!comeonpeoplehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14664623437721571000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-63221969879952790162009-11-16T12:55:40.234+01:002009-11-16T12:55:40.234+01:00You know who you remind me of Jesse Cornish? Lydia...You know who you remind me of Jesse Cornish? Lydia Bennet.....<br /><br />Well guess what no one here is jealous of your match made in heaven to Sarah Palin. No one!Truly Mad;y Deeplynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-2974798423991543502009-11-16T11:35:25.228+01:002009-11-16T11:35:25.228+01:00The only reason Jessie is stickin' around here...The only reason Jessie is stickin' around here is he knows the Palin story is going to blow<br /><br />Biting his fingernails every minute when a new post comes up<br /><br />He just can't stay away!!<br /><br />If this site was just a bunch of nutcases blabbing about fairy tales.. makes no sense.. is full of silly fabrications.. <br />Then why stick around.. or err.. why does ole' Jessie "live" here<br />He seems to comment faithfully every hour<br /><br />It is just a little ole' blog... out of the bazillions on the internet..but Jessie has parked his butt right here<br />Why Jess?<br /><br />Are you worried you might miss something if you step away?<br /><br />I peek over at Pee Pee land a few times a week.. but I nevah comment and nevah sit there more than 2 min<br />because the site is a joke<br />Too many flying brain screws for my taste<br /><br />But you like to sit here and engage in conversation... <br /><br />This little old blog full of petty speculations must get a widdle under the skin, eh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56121788883344869.post-36097458880021349102009-11-16T11:18:40.644+01:002009-11-16T11:18:40.644+01:00You know Patrick, you give me too much credit, cre...You know Patrick, you give me too much credit, credit I don't deserve. I certainly did not alert HarperCollins, and I am not the only one monitoring this blog. I seem to be the only active sane poster here, but that's another story.<br /><br />You know who you remind me of?Bennett.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com