Citizen-bloggers can make it into the mainstream media - here is more proof for it. This is good news for EVERY blogger!
You can never look at these pictures often enough - but let me also say it's not just pictures we have, but in addition we have solid inside information about the FACT that Sarah Palin hasn't given birth to Trig (click to enlarge):
Graphics created by our reader WayOfPeace,
This is how Sarah Palin looked
MSNBC: Can you now please start to report about Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy with Trig ("babygate")?
It's about time that the mainstream media finally does its job and reports this huge scandal!
+++You can never look at these pictures often enough - but let me also say it's not just pictures we have, but in addition we have solid inside information about the FACT that Sarah Palin hasn't given birth to Trig (click to enlarge):
Graphics created by our reader WayOfPeace,
Slideshow courtesy of our fellow blogger and Trig Truther Bree Palin!
This is how Sarah Palin looked when she was pregnant with Track (click to enlarge).
This picture was provided to AP by the Heath family in 2008.
Please click on the title of the blog post or CLICK HERE before using the toolbar below for sharing.
451 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 401 – 451 of 451The bottom line is that is has been proven time and again that Sarah Palin lies. This isn't opinion it is FACT. She has been caught in more than just one or two lies.
She is a proven liar.
No one, ever, should just take her word as truthful after all the lies she has told that can easily be proven as lies.
Everything she says should be verified before accepting it as truthful simply because she is a known and established liar.
HollyP
In case you didn't read it, Patrick also covered the issue that Trig's "birth" gave Sarah star power in the eyes of the far right christian movement.
http://palingates.blogspot.com/2009/10/max-blumenthal-talks-about-republican.html
PD did not shut down because she was recieving death threats. She writes porn, and she and her husband did not want that made public. Tha was the threat.
And looks like the media is done with this story. Time to o back to your hole...lol.
I don't feed trolls as a rule, but JC, why didn't she show the reporter from the very freindly ADN a birth certificate or the many items one has after a new baby, like the hospital bracelets the baby and the mother wore (I have mine) photos of the first moment (I have mine in the OR after the C-section) or the paper with the footprint and the parents names.....she could have shown the reporter all this in the privacy of her home and the story would be OVER.
Why NOT do this? After she begged the paper to dispel the rumors?
Either she CAN'T prove Trig is her biological child or she enjoys the gossip because she could end this gossip today. Why NOT?
"substantive issues"--
the trolls want to debate on substantive issues?
Listen, trolls, I've tried debating you clowns on real issues time and time again. Not ONE of you can name three policies Palin claims to stand for that she successfully implemented as Governor.
Noe one of you has read the actual PDFs of her budgets to see the gross deficits she left both Wasilla and AK in.
Not a ONE of you has ever addressed the fact that she took the most pork EVER as mayor per capita (hired a lobbyist to get it, too) and had the highest rate of taking pork in AK as gov per capita as well.
Now, you then claim people hate her because she's a fiscal conservative.
She is NO fiscal conservative.
You say that because you have fairy dust in your eyes, not because you are attached in any way to the facts.
Now, if you admitted that she was a socialist who endangered people's lives (actually 250 plus people died due to her incompetence and she's being sued over this) and is historically incapable of governing so much as a WalMart, and just admitted that you LOVE her for no reason at all...
Maybe you'd understand what is so upsetting to us.
You LOVE her. Her PAC and Facebook page read like a fan club of adoring 12 year olds -- not as a serious politician.
And that's on YOU guys, not her.
You guys make her look even worse to the public with your fawning, Twilight-esque mania over a person you do not know, especially when you are past the age of 12. The coup de grace is when you can't even answer the simplest question about WHY you support her without resorting to platitudes and cliches.
You say, "She's real!" "She's honest!" etc. In the face of ALL fact that she is in fact NOT real and is anything but honest.
Now, if you LOVE her because she's your gal, you like her legs and you're super glad she's a "Christian" and you don't care that she does not behave as a Christian should, then FINE!
Admit it!
And then admit to yourself that you've been following a crush and elevated someone you do not know and willfully turn a blind eye about to a possible president.
Now, does that sound like a good idea after 8 years of Bush?
Oh, I keep forgetting that you are the same 23%ers who think Bush was doin' a super job.
I don't hate Sarah Palin. I don't respect her. And I really don't respect anyone who can't name three REAL policies of hers, but would vote her into the highest office of the land because in her they see themselves. Not GOOD enough.
Until you can TALK policy, don't leave psuedo tough guy faux bravado posts here about how we should be "talking issues".
Sarah Palin herself admitted she didn't know anything abut the issues and it DID NOT MATTER because the people loved her. Next time you post nonsense like that, be prepared to get out of your easy chair, put down the CliffNotes version of your favorite Ayn Rand novel and wipe the Dorito dust off your fingers before you post, because I will expect you to deliver something other than a bumper sticker phrase.
You voted for Bush and you have the unmitigated GALL to come here and act like we're nuts? Get a clue. Am I angry? You betcha! You people drove this country over the ground the last 8 years and now you're at it again, and you have the temerity to carry yourselves with smug self-righteousness.
Patrick...
You state in this post that you have solid inside information that makes it a fact that Palin did not give birth to Trig.
Yet you have never told what this info is, just like Palin will not humor you with her information of proof that she did.
Someone is lying. Prove its not you.
I guess just like Palin... Omitting information is the same as lying according to you.
If you wont prove it then you are the liar. Just like Palin.
You can say it till your blue in the face, just like Palin does. But you are gonna have to pony up if you want to be believed.
I call bullshit, and you are the liar here.
People in glass houses shouldnt throw rocks.
You are just like her.
Anon @ 16:00
You can throw the same argument at Patrick.
He claims to have proof he has not shown.
Palin and alot of other people claim he is a liar.
Why doesnt he just prove it! He could stop this once and for all.
Right!
But he doesnt because he is a liar.
The outing of this hoax will bring SPalin down. She now has a lot of money and backing. I suspect there are many who would like to put a cap on this hoax to keep the money flowing in. So, it is quite possible that someone is trying to fix the roof on this.
I do not believe that SPalin is the birth mother of baby Trig. And the deception to the American public for political gain is inexcusable.
The photo evidence shows she was not pregnant during her partial term in office. And having the experience of two deliveries with amino leakage, I never believed that wild ride story for a moment. Documents can be generated and some people will lie at the drop of a hat. If there was no deception, why where photos scrubbed from the state website?
Remember Eve standing near the tree, and Satan gave her a truth, a half truth and lie. Too bad Eve didn't have photo evidence and personal experience to know Satan was deceiving her.
There is enough documented proof that SPalin is a liar. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit---
Matthew 7:15-23 (KJV)
-Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
-Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
-Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
-A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
-Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
-Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
-Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
-Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
-And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you; depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Jesse...
Let me answer some questions for you.
No their IS NOT any doctor willing to go on record saying that they believe Palin was not pregnant. Not a single one.
FACT: Palin has a doctor that has gone on record stating that Palin was pregnant with Trig.
No there IS NOT any one who will go on record stating anything against CBJs letter.
These are the FACTS... and these are the FACTS that palingates cannot get around. No one is going to believe a bunch of bloggers over a medical doctors statement.
This they cannot get past because they cannot ge ANYONE to refute it.
There's a reason that generations of PR professionals have advised all manner of miscreants to get the bad news out early and put the embarrassment behind you. If you're a big-deal public figure, it's going to come out anyway, especially in this age of blogs and gossip sites, of voice mail and texting.
Tiger & Sarah Problems
But what will Sarah do? Dust off the divorce/infidelity stories. You Betcha! Any publicity is good publicity to Sarah.
People should ignore the trolls. This blog doesn't have to prove anything. If she wants, Sarah Palin can try to prove that she is the birth mother of Trig. She is not required to do so.
@16.16
Hi Bluetx!
Jesse:
Since Andrew Sullivan found 8 doctors why not email him to get the names/numbers to verify this?
The gynecologist interviewed who said that a woman who is leaking amniotic fluid should get herself to a hospital ASAP and not wait from the ADN article is named Dr. Laurie Gregg from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Sacremento, CA. Here's the article: http://www.adn.com/626/story/382864.html
I know that's not enough for you, Jesse, but heck. I was bored and tried.
I wish I could remember where I saw the post...It was somewhere on Audrey's blog but the poster had printed out many images of Sarah during Feb/Mar/Apr 2008, blocked out her face with sticky notes, and brought the images to her own doctor to ask if it was possible for a 6 lb baby to have been born from that body. The doctor had said nope, there was no way that could have happened. Then the poster had removed the stickies and the doctor was shocked beyond belief what they had seen. Sadly, I cannot remember the poster who said it or even when, but I thought the story was interesting to post
Hi again BlueTx
Why didn't her doctor include her two miscarriages in the medical statement? Why didn't her doctor include the fact that Trig has multiple holes in his heart which may require surgery as mentioned by Barbara Walters? Why did her doctor give the wrong date for Piper's birth year?
sunshine 1970
Palin's Peyton Place
New Mexico Republican politicians don't want Palin's help:
"A spokesman for GOP gubernatorial candidate Doug Turner — a self-described moderate Republican — when asked Tuesday about whether Turner would attend the Roswell book signing said, “We’ve not been invited to participate in the Sarah Palin book tour, so Doug won’t be on hand. I haven’t looked at his schedule for early December, but he will probably be out shaking hands across the state on a tour of his own.” Asked if he’d be seeking Palin’s support in the primary, spokesman Zack Ireland said, “Probably not — with no disrespect to Sarah or her fans.
"A campaign spokesman for Susana Martinez also said his candidate won’t be in Roswell on Dec. 1. “Susana is going to be working in Cruces that entire week.” As far as seeking Palin’s support in the governor’s race, Jamie Estrada said Tuesday, “Susana is focused on earning the support of New Mexicans as demonstrated by the endorsements she has recently received from people like (Bernalillo Country Sheriff) Darren White and other elected officials.
h/t Lynnrockets
What, now we have to wake up to this Jesse Cornish? Boy, we must be getting closer...... Or else Jesse Cornish is just a lonely individual with nothing better to do. Keep ignoring, though, people.
People, you really don't need to engage the troll. He was involved with Riehl and McCain in the harassment of Audrey and Gryphen. What do you suppose his purpose is?
Anon. 16:16 is not BlueTx. It's Jesse answering his own questions. LMAO! Now that's funny.
Sarah Palin is not thick-skinned enough to run for national office. It's just that simple. Ya gotta be tough as nails, beyond tough. As for her ability to make lots of money, who knows? And yes, ignore the trolls...so annoying and distracting, but not worth any time and energy. No matter what they say here, this train has left the station and they ain't going to get it to turn around. No way, no how. It's too late, and their girl just can't hack it anyway. They should just give up.
Man, we start pointing out Sarah's hypocrisy and the fact that real Christians believe and readily confess that Jesus is Lord and these trolls just start coming out like crazy. They just hate hearing the truth about their well-documented liar, Sarah 'Quitter' Palin.
Sorry for the long post. This is from Palin's Peyton Place and a must read.
---------------------------------
What my OB GYN had to say
I had my annual appointment due with my gynecologist doctor coming up and I had an idea regarding this whole Sarah Palin, was-she-pregnant-or-not-issue. I wanted to show her pictures of the supposed 'pregnancy' and ask her opinion. I was nervous about doing that because:
1. She, like most doctors, are extremely busy and can often be overbooked. I didn't want to take up too much of her time if other women needed to see her.
2. I live in Northeast GA. This is very much a bible belt, republican entrenched area. Many can be quick to take offense over politics. I have never spoken to my doctor about politics, so I didn't know how she might take those questions.
I decided to deal with it like this; I would have prints made that, in my view as a nurse, were the most striking to show she wasn't pregnant. Also, I would cover Sarah's face and whomever she was with so that there would not be any 'pre-judgment' with any partisan leanings. I felt this would be the best way to leave out politics, and instead, to focus on science.
So, in that time-honored position of feet-in-the-stirrups, I asked, "When you're done down there, would you mind looking at some pregnancy pictures that I had some questions about?"
Thankfully, she said, "Sure.'
I covered all of the faces.
Just seeing the bottom of those pictues, many people are going to know which picture it is, but, amazingly, this isn't a well-covered story. I felt like if my doctor had not been covering the blogs, she would not be familiar with those pictures. I was right. I cut up 4x6 index cards and taped them to the side when I took them to my doctor. She had no idea who she was looking at.
(Picture - 3/18/08)
This was the first picture I showed to her. I asked, "In your professional opinion, is this woman 30 - 31 weeks pregnant. She said, "I can't tell in this picture. But from what I can see, she doesn't look pregnant at all."
(Picture - 3/18/08 lightened)
The very next picture I showed her was this one. I said, "Ok, now, this woman says she is 30 - 31 weeks pregant in this picture. What do you think."
OB GYN: "There is no way this woman is 30 or 31 weeks pregnant.
(Picture - 3/26/08)
I then showed her this one and said, "She says she is 31 - 32 weeks pregnant here."
(3/26/08 Close up and lightened)
I also showed her this close-up of the picture. She said, "I don't see how she can even begin to claim she is 30 weeks here."
(Picture - 4/8/08 33-34 weeks)
I then showed this picture of Palin with Elan Frank during his documentry filming. I told my doctor that this picture was taken 12 days after the previous picture.
(Picture - 4/8/08 screen shot of same day.)
I then showed her this one of the screen shot taken at the same time. At this point she seemed dumbfounded and said, "Well, I can tell you it just doesn't work that way. It is hard to tell in this picture, but this doesn't look like a pregnant belly at all!"
(Picture - 4/8/08 Screen shot lightened even more.)
I showed her this one that had been lightened even more. She shook her head and said, "No, this isn't a pregnant looking belly. This looks strange. Sorta like a square-shaped pillow." I thought it was funny that she used the exact words that other people have used to describe this picture.
Cont'd
(Picture - April 13, 08)
I told my doctor this picture was taken 5 days after the previous picture taken during the documentry. She said, "This looks more like a real pregnant woman." She then said, "What happened, did she get a better prosthetic?"
(Picture - April 13, 08 close up of belly.)
I added in the close up here. I said, "She is suppose to be 34 weeks here." My doctor said,"Yes, in this picture I would say she appears to be 34 wks.
I then put those 2 pictures side-by-side.
I put the picture taken on March 18th, 08 taken by Alaska Daily News where she is suppose to be 30 or 31weeks pregnant beside the close-up of the picture taken on April 13,08where she is suppose to be 34 weeks pregnant and asked her, "Is this in any way medically possible?" Can a woman go from being very slender and thin with a flat abdomen to looking close to a normal sized 8 month pregnancy in 4weeks?"
She said,"There is no way!"
My gynecologist's final word on the matter is that in her professional opinion is that there is no way that this could be medically possible. I then took all of the coverings off the faces in the pictures and showed her who it was. She was shocked! She said, "I can't believe more people don't know about this."
http://www.palinpeytonplace.com/ob-gyn-shocked.html
Again, with or without trolls, with or without palibans and palinbots, the truth will come out and Sarah will go down (something she is very familiar with according to sources in Alaska).
She will go down because she has chosen to trash, step on, bad mouth, and stab in the back, her friends.
She has no one but herself to blame, when her "fake" bus tour by jetstream crashes.
She will always have her batshit crazy flying monkeys, but she proved to people who supported her that she is simply a creepy paranoid schizo who will destroy anyone and anything for the almighty dollar.
Her "friends" will finish her off. Just my prediction.
Good luck with that Bowling League thing Sarah. You've come a long way baby....
Patrick, Regina, Kathleen, et al,
I think you should put up the post from Palin's Peyton Place along with the pictures that were posted on that site.
Now that you have the attention, this should be seen. I think this is excellent evidence that Ms. Palin faked a pregnancy.
We would need the permission of the site owner before we can re-post her blog and photos. I'll contact her and see what we can do.
Thanks Kathleen. I hope you do get permission.
Unfortunately Debbie has no email contact on the page.
I'll leave a message on the blog, but can't do more than that for now.
next thing you know, jesse will be asking for documented proof of gravity.
observing the proof in front of his face just isn't enough.
It may be that Sarah's "accurate history," which she wants taught and mentioned in last night's speech, is the Bible's creation story. She needs to be pressed for an answer to what she means by "accurate history."
Are the conflicting stories she's told about so many of the events and people in her life "accurate history?" If she can't keep the details of her own life straight, how could she judge whether any history is accurate?
Damn, 444 comments, and counting.
Looks like The Truth is getting the panties of all the Palinbot Zombie Trolls all bunched up!
Woohoo, love all the attention we're getting, thanks to them!
Someone asked, "Is it true that when a publisher states that a book has sold a million, it means that stores have ordered a million, NOT that customers have bought a million copies? I read once that after a few months, the stores will return the unsold copies back to the publisher."
No, publishers today know very quickly down to the last book how many have sold at various outlets. Within ten days of my books' release my editor is sending me breakdowns of, so many sold at B&N, so many at Amazon, so many at Borders, etc. They just add them all up. There is also something called Bookscan, but it is not complete.
It is true that bookstores will eventually return any unsold copies to the publisher (actually, hardcovers are returned; paperbacks are just "stripped" and the cover mailed back). So all those bookstores required to order 2,500 copies of Sarah's book in order to get her to do a signing will eventually send the 1,500 they didn't sell back to the publisher. Given how fast she was in and out of those stores, you can be sure she wasn't signing stock for them.
As I've said before, this is the kind of book that has large initial sales which fall off rapidly because all of the fans rush out to buy the book as soon as it is released. HC may do a third printing to support stores where it is selling heavily, but I suspect they'll soon have returns flooding into their warehouses.
There's no denying she's sold a hell of a lot of books--far more than I predicted. But Murdoch has still lost a lot of money on this, between the big advance he gave her and this ridiculous diva tour. This was a political contribution disguised as a book deal. I'm wondering what she promised him in return. He ain't doin' this out of the kindness of his heart.
Hey everyone - one more thing:
When people just can't believe that Sarah Palin faked a pregnancy, ask them if they know about Jack Nicholson.
http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/nicholson.asp
Ask them if they know about Beccah Beushausen.
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2009/jun/12/local/chi-baby-hoax-12jun12
It happens. People do it. Why is it so hard to believe a woman who has been proven to lie about dozens of things isn't one of them?
Cashin' In? You Betcha
This blog is getting so popular, there are so many comments ... any way the 'anonymous' commenting could be removed so that people have to use a consistent identity? It's gotten so difficult to respond to specific posts, or keep track of who said what!
OT, but - I think religion is just a part of this, as much as we want to focus on it exclusively. I wrote this on another blog, and this is where my thinking rests now: Another thing to watch, if Sarah Palin is allowed to go to Fort Hood, of all places, the MSM really needs to look into it. Her bus has political fundraising information on it, and from what I understand this is against Army policy. I think we need to remember, Sarah Palin is probably being supported from the shadows by a scary alliance of Neocons (read: oil industry business interests + arms industry interests) and End Timer Christian Fundamentalists. That's a dangerous combination if ever there was one. Approval for access to military bases may be coming from higher up than we'd want to believe. Presdident Obama gets this; he said we weren't going to stay in Afghanistan or anywhere else to "make money". Can you imagine being in his shoes, being up against the nefarious forces I am talking about? These people need the US to have enemies around the world so that they can keep making billions on WAR. Eisenhower said it himself, "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
"We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."
She has been using the GOP talking points from Dick Cheney - saying President Obama was "dithering".
She is the perfect cover for them. If we let her, and them, get away with it.
Andrew Sullivan announced today he has broke from the right wing party. I read an article about it over at HuffPost, religion played a part in his decision. I found this site over there!
Sorry- I meant... weakening her immune system.
and for the first time my wv is..
snergi---as in "its not enough energy!"
NEW POST UP!
:::---)))
Jesse Cornish said...I also find it interesting that the goal posts keep moving. First it was a forged doctor's letter, now she is in on the conspiracy.
Only Jesse makes sense on this blog.
Having two possible explanations from the beginning is not changing the goal posts.
Anonymous said...
I don't feed trolls as a rule, but JC, why didn't she show the reporter from the very freindly ADN a birth certificate or the many items one has after a new baby, like the hospital bracelets the baby and the mother wore (I have mine) photos of the first moment (I have mine in the OR after the C-section) or the paper with the footprint and the parents names.....she could have shown the reporter all this in the privacy of her home and the story would be OVER.
Why NOT do this? After she begged the paper to dispel the rumors?
Either she CAN'T prove Trig is her biological child or she enjoys the gossip because she could end this gossip today. Why NOT?
03 December 2009 16:00
Enough proof had been presented already. There was no need for Sarah Palin to cooperate in a news story the aim of which was to soothe the souls of conspiracy theorists.
And a shout out to "not that sarah", three things Sarah Palin accomplished: She signed into law ethics legislation, she cut spending, and she signed a bill that would over a 10 year period lead to the construction of a natural gas pipeline.
And this is from the troll under the bridge.
Go read Patrick's newest post, Jesse. Your queen is a no-good liar.
Sunshine1970 said...
Jesse:
Since Andrew Sullivan found 8 doctors why not email him to get the names/numbers to verify this?
The gynecologist interviewed who said that a woman who is leaking amniotic fluid should get herself to a hospital ASAP and not wait from the ADN article is named Dr. Laurie Gregg from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Sacremento, CA. Here's the article: http://www.adn.com/626/story/382864.html
I know that's not enough for you, Jesse, but heck. I was bored and tried.
I wish I could remember where I saw the post...It was somewhere on Audrey's blog but the poster had printed out many images of Sarah during Feb/Mar/Apr 2008, blocked out her face with sticky notes, and brought the images to her own doctor to ask if it was possible for a 6 lb baby to have been born from that body. The doctor had said nope, there was no way that could have happened. Then the poster had removed the stickies and the doctor was shocked beyond belief what they had seen. Sadly, I cannot remember the poster who said it or even when, but I thought the story was interesting to post
03 December 2009 16:24
I might just ask Sullivan for the names, but he will probably cite confidentality. But its worth a try. However, even if I got the names of every one of those doctors, it would not answer my question-can you prove based on those photographs that Sarah Palin was not pregnant? The only doctor I know of that has spoken up, the one from the ADN, has not answered that question.
To Ressie:
Give me the name of the doctor involved so I can verify the accuracy of the blog.
There's no denying she's sold a hell of a lot of books--far more than I predicted. But Murdoch has still lost a lot of money on this, between the big advance he gave her and this ridiculous diva tour. This was a political contribution disguised as a book deal. I'm wondering what she promised him in return. He ain't doin' this out of the kindness of his heart.
How do you know Murdoch lost money? Do you somehow have access to data that no one else has?
I wonder what Sarah Palin's biggest fans would say if and when they are given irrefutable evidence that she faked her pregnancy. Would they care? What if they were stalking this blog for months and months stating that we are all crazy for even suggesting such a think. What would a die-hard Sarah fan say in the face of real and hard proof?
Reesie, that's an excellent post. Thanks! It makes me wonder if there is a way to do the same thing and make a poster or advertisement showing her body but not her head...using the same idea.
And Patrick and Kathleen, kudos and more thanks for your hard work. I don't know how you do it, but I really appreciate all the time and effort you are putting into this.
If neither Sarah nor Bristol are Trig's mother, then WHO IS??
I'm not a Palin supporter in any way, shape or form; I'm just curious about who you think Trig's biological
mom might be.
Might this be the big secret Levi Johnson mentioned?
Sarah Palin is a human being. She is conservative and has views that differ from most of the people who post here. From what I have read about YOUR views, that is a good thing. I don't know what it is about Mrs. Palin that makes liberal women absolutely crazy. Is she a good mom? Yes. Do her kids make mistakes? Yes. NEWSFLASH--so do YOURS. So do mine. Is she the smartest person on the planet? NO. Is Obama the smartest person on the planet? NO. But after reading the posts of the women who post here, I just want to throw up. Petty, stupid, resentful, jealous, idiotic comments abound. You guys need to get a life.
Post a Comment