Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts

Thursday, 26 May 2011

Sarah Palin going on another bus tour

This lovely picture comes from Lallalori's Flickr collection

Sarah Palin is on the bus again, according to RealClearPolitics:

In a move designed to propel her closer to a presidential run, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin will set out on a bus tour of the country on Sunday, making stops at symbolic sites along the way.

"Starting this weekend, Sarah Palin will embark on a ‘One Nation' tour of historical sites that were key to the formation, survival, and growth of the United States of America," SarahPAC treasurer Tim Crawford said in a statement to RealClearPolitics. "The tour will originate in Washington, D.C. It will proceed north up the east coast."

Members of Palin's immediate family are expected to join her on the trip, which will eventually take her through key early-voting states.


Well, well... a film and another bus tour.

The snippet shown on Hannity was very boring, was that the best clip he could get? Sarah Palin's Alaska was far more entertaining.

I wonder which members of the family will tour with Sarah this time. I also wonder if they'll travel on the bus while she jets to the next destination. Here's the real bus:


I'm trying to take this seriously, but it sounds like the circus coming to town, I can't help myself. I wish she would announce or get out of the bush, this whole cat-and-mouse game is getting very tedious.

Come on Sarah, isn't that fire in your belly raging by now? Or are you waiting for your friend God to crack the door open just a little bit so you can plow through it?

Thursday, 16 December 2010

Charles Krauthammer thinks that Sarah Palin is still not ready to run for the Presidency


Sarah Palin - Empty vessel

GUEST POST BY KATHLEEN

On December 14th, 2010 Bill O’Reilly discussed Sarah Palin’s prospects of becoming the Republican Party’s representative in the 2012 race against President Obama with the leading conservative commenter Charles Krauthammer. Krauthammer recently annoyed many conservatives when he suggested on PBS Inside Washington that conservatism does not begin and end with Sarah Palin and previously in July 2009 when he stated that Sarah was not a serious contender for President:

She has star power without any doubt. She has an extremely devoted following. But she is not a serious candidate for the presidency. She had to go home and study and spend a lot of time on issues in which she was not adept last year, and she hasn’t. She has to stop speaking in clichés and platitudes. It won’t work.

It could work for eight weeks if you’re the number two candidate, as she was last year. But even so, she got singed a lot in that campaign. You cannot sustain a campaign of platitudes and clichés over a year and a half if you’re running for the presidency.

It is clear that “The Hammer” has not changed his mind and that he feels that Sarah Palin still has much to learn. Significantly, his latest remarks to Bill O’Reilly regarding her possible candidacy must affect her because as it has been pointed out in a Business Insider article she, or her ghost, has frequently linked to him on both Facebook and Twitter, most likely in an effort to be taken seriously by him.



But I think in part it's that she's not practiced in policy. The Katie Couric interview she originally had was not a gotcha interview. There were fairly simple questions she had trouble answering. I think that damaged her in the eyes of even non-ideological people. Now I would have hoped she'd spend the next years getting really deep into policy and becoming an expert the way a lot of other candidates have done as they mature and approach the presidency. She hasn't. She has a political star. She's out there, she's very attractive both politically and ideologically to a large segment of Republicans. But I think if you want to expand your base you have to get into policy even though it sounds dull.

Krauthammer was correct when he referred back to the Katie Couric interview as evidence of her lack of knowledge. Sarah Palin and her supporters seek to bury the importance of that interview by constantly harkening back to Katie’s question regarding Palin’s reading material. It is my view that such efforts are merely made to distract from the far more worrisome revelation that Palin lacks any real policy knowledge and that this was more than evident when she fumbled her way through the series of fairly basic foreign policy questions that Couric asked. I also think that it is unlikely that Palin will subject herself to the same level of examination again anytime soon, unless, of course, the questions have been pre-screened or she can answer them via email.

Krauthammer also makes a salient point which is that Sarah Palin is a shiny object with no real solutions for the deep problems that the USA presently faces. It is not enough for her to jab her finger at the opposition unless she wants to remain a heckler. If Sarah Palin wants to be seriously considered as a Presidential candidate she has to knuckle down and like all serious candidates get on with the hard work of getting to grips with policy. Can a quitter do that?

Monday, 14 June 2010

Sarah Palin in 2012?


Will she or won't she? This question has been asked many times by people from all shades of the political spectrum since Sarah Palin quit the office of governor of Alaska. It became quite clear early on that the prospect of making huge amounts of money appeared to be her main motivation. That's fine. Go ahead Sarah, fleece your followers, bleed them dry. Have your Sarah Palin's Alaska next to the poodles, mall cops, strange pregnancies and all the other inspiring programs on TLC.

But a number of other things make the whole scenario very disturbing. Sarah Palin's Facebook notes used to be amusing in the good old days of settling scores with imagined perverted late night show hosts. Then they took a more sinister tone and it became obvious that they were not written by some misguided spokesperson in Alaska. We detected the hand of an ex-c4p attack dog as her notes started to display copious footnotes. So far so good. When a couple of notes appeared on Bill Kristol's site before being published on Facebook, the alarm bells rang. A lot of notes were beyond the scope of Rebecca Mansour, the ones that attempted to disrupt the healthcare debate, the ones about oil, energy and the environment. We could see the Neocons and Corporate America behind them.

Don't forget the Supreme Court decision that granted personhood to the corporations.

I have a theory. The book tour was an exercise in testing the waters. The puppetmasters had a reasonably attractive woman pitched against a president who faced enormous challenges (and black to boot) regarding the economy. The book tour went reasonably well. Then came Fox News and the speaking engagements. Sarah Palin started speaking for the nation, becoming increasingly more aggressive. The media dutifully reported on her every word, she was never out of the headlines. Tea parties and a few endorsements kept the momentum.


If interest started waning, a new enemy was quickly found and new fences quickly erected, not without endless whining interviews with Fox News colleagues. Another media frenzy.

They kept her controversial and hogging the media (again) by exploiting the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Extreme greenies and "Heck, gimme a call" guaranteed more hilarity and the ever important headlines.

They stepped up the endorsements in a timely fashion, the theme being a new brand of "feminism." Male or female, all her candidates are pro-life, pro-second amendment, commonsense conservatives who want to go back to the founding fathers and the constitution. This mantra is repeated again and again and again.

Primaries over? Interest on the wane again? No problem, let's have a boobiegate. Sarah goes rogue and shows up at traditional racetrack dressed for a picnic in the park flashing her twin peaks and the headlines are all hers again.


It doesn't matter if she's ridiculed. Their objective is name recognition and word association. Commonsense conservatism/low taxes/second amendment/pro-life/constitution go with the big or small boobed package. Every day, every hour, every single minute they can grab.

Away from Sarah Palin, they're drumming the beat that President Obama is a socialist. That's a four letter word for a great number of Americans.

There are plans to send her across the pond for a meeting with the woman who, together with Ronald Reagan, brought down the Soviet Union. See? Sarah Palin is NOT a socialist and rubs shoulders with a major player in the world of international politics. It doesn't matter that Thatcher is "non compos mentis."

The Republican Party is making it acceptable to have candidates refuse to debate their opponents or give interviews to the "lamestream" media. These would have been the biggest hurdles in Sarah Palin's way to the White House.

There is a strong possibility that a well timed major incident may be staged by the puppetmasters, plunging the present administration into a homeland security crisis.

The puppetmasters are cleverly making a great number of people identify with their mantra, making them feel important as "Real Americans." Sarah Palin is one of them. She's beautiful, shapely, her family has problems they can see as their own. She's a good Christian who turns to God for everything.

Many Americans don't bother to vote. Those who vote may face machines with a mind of their own. It worked for George W Bush.


Imagine a low information voter who was convinced to vote as a "Real American" looking at a ballot with the name of a white, attractive, outspoken, Christian woman they saw on the cover of numerous tabloids, glossy magazines and the TV against the still strange sounding name of a black, "muslim" socialist man who's going to take away their constitutional rights and who can't protect them against the enemy.

Another clever trick is to label the colluding sections media "lamestream," distancing herself from them. As well as Fox News, others also carry Sarah Palin's water and are very instrumental in reinforcing the myth, even when they appear to be critical, as they don't ask any relevant questions or contradict her statements. They ridicule but don't call her out on the issues. By referring to a "liberal" media in a sweeping generalization, Sarah Palin appears to be swimming against the current, enhancing her image as the outsider and underdog, a very appealing image for a petite but feisty woman. Of course, not all journalists play this game and regularly call her bluff. If only they had louder voices...

Sarah Palin's own father let it slip that she doesn't make her own decisions. Sometimes we think she's losing it and will not be viable as a candidate. To the puppetmasters it doesn't matter one bit what comes out of her mouth or gets posted on Facebook or Twitter, as long as the mantra is repeated and reinforced, as long as everybody instantly recognizes Sarah Palin, as long as large sections of the media play the game and report her insane rantings as something serious, without asking any awkward questions.


America is a very democratic country. People like Bonzo's partner and the Terminator can achieve high offices in government. Sarah Palin has already been there without having ever been a Hollywood star.

We live in a world where the cult of celebrity is all pervasive and it has spilled into politics. We live in a world where politics is almost the synonym of dirty tricks and in America, corporations are citizens.

We may laugh at Sarah Palin. But we can't let THEM have the last laugh.

Think about it.

(This post was written after some phone conversations with Kathleen and after I read some comments expressing the fears outlined above. H/Ts all round!)
.

Sunday, 22 November 2009

Sarah Palin 2012: The Trailer + Bonus Material / UPDATE: Sarah Palin twitter-madness alert!

Freshly grabbed from the tube - Sarah Palin 2012 Trailer:




+++

Last year, I was very impressed by this trailer, which I like even more:





Please click on the title of the blogpost or CLICK HERE before using the toolbar below for sharing.

+++

UPDATE:

The Sarah Palin twitter-madness has started again! Someone call William Shatner!



What the heck are "tailgate-parties"?

OK, please excuse my European ignorance. Wikipedia knows:

In the United States, a tailgate party is a social event held on and around the open tailgate of a vehicle. Tailgating often involves consuming beverages and grilling food. Tailgate parties usually occur in the parking lots at stadiums and arenas before, and occasionally after or during, sporting events and rock concerts. People attending such a party are said to be tailgating.

Sorry if I explain something to you here what you probably have know already your whole life. ;-)

Now we know what Sarah Palin likes to do in her free time. I guess Sarah Palin wouldn't have dinner in the White House, but a tailgate party.

EDIT:

I have been accused of giving the impression of being an "elitist" because I made fun of tailgate-parties. Please note that it was not my intention to offend any particpants of tailgate-parties. I am well aware that tailgate-parties can be great fun and that probably large parts of the population enjoy tailgate-parties independent of their political views. I can also imagine that even highly educated people are probably not shy to participate in tailgate parties. My comments here were just written with my tongue firmly placed in my cheek - hence the "satire" warning in the labels of this post. When I join the elite, I will let you know.

+++

What's up in D.C.? Where? Maybe in the building with this big round roof which is standin' around there?