Showing posts with label libya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label libya. Show all posts

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Sarah Palin, please shut up!

President Obama



Senator John McCain

Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona was critical of the president’s timetable for action in Libya, but said he is confident the American military will succeed.

“He (President Obama) waited too long, there is no doubt in my mind about it. But now, it is what it is,” McCain said in an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” taped Friday. “We need now to support him and the efforts that our military are going to make. And I regret that it didn’t – we didn’t act much more quickly, and we could have.”

Reality show star Sarah Palin




(Transcript of the interview for those who can't stand the sound of Sarah Palin's voice. Plus, longer version at Politicususa)


I have the impression that if Obama went to Libya and dispatched Gaddafi with his own hands, Sarah Palin would find something wrong with it. Greta Van Susteren lost her way during the interview and contradicted herself several times. Obama is wrong when he doesn't act and he's wrong when he does.

Sarah Palin doesn't understand the word humanitarian, only American interests. She doesn't understand what team effort means and doesn't recognize the international community. If she had her way, the US would be at war with half of the world, picking and choosing which regimes to change, who to assassinate, all according to her own "doctrine." Kill, baby, kill!

Now she really pissed me off.

Sarah Palin's America is the America people all over the world feared and despised. The America that had only its own interests coming into play, without regard for the interests of the people in other countries. America was involved in many armed conflicts in the past, not always with proper justification for its actions.

America also waged regime changes from behind the curtains. Brazil, Chile, countries in Central America and many others had to swallow America's version of democracy, based on America's interests only. I'll speak for Brazil, where we had to endure over twenty years of American endorsed military dictatorship, where people "disappeared," were imprisoned for no good reason or had to leave the country (if they could). If it's wrong for a tyrant to impose his own will on his own people, what makes it right for America to act in the same way, imposing her own will on the rest of the world?

The Europeans and their empires shaped the fractured world we have today; their legacy is not an honourable one, but they appear to have learned a few lessons along the way. Why should anybody want an American Empire, why should anybody want America (or any other country) calling all the shots???

Living in a peaceful world can only be achieved if we work together and remember the lessons from history. In Sarah Palin's world, might is right and whether she likes it or not, America is no longer the mightiest of them all. She has already been poking at a country that is gaining power and will continue to do so.

Sarah Palin's America is a danger to Americans and to the rest of the world.

Thursday, 24 March 2011

Sarah Palin v Obama on Libya - Soundbites v Real Leadership

Sarah Palin talked to Greta Van Susteren about Libya and was her usual gung-ho self, attacking the president for not taking the lead, blah blah. Sarah Palin's approach to foreign relations, diplomacy and strategy is "bull in a china shop" style and if anybody shows disrespect for "our men and women in uniform," it's her, not the president. In her book, the troops are there for America to display her might without any regard to the loss of human lives. She also shows disrespect for America, as any major involvement in another conflict would hurt the recovering economy.



America has taken the lead, but being engaged in two other wars, there is understandable concern abour further involvement in Libya. John Bohener demanded to know when Obama is going to hand over control of the operation to European and other allies.



There are conflicting views about Obama's approach to the situation in Libya and what role America should play in it. In the UK, some commentators said Obama is the first American president to show real leadership in a long time. On Newsnight a couple of nights ago, the general consensus was that president Obama is right in his balanced decision to let the international community take the lead, with America as a team player instead of going in with all guns blazing and taking other countries kicking and screaming into the battle as it did in the past. These political commentators recognize that president Obama is dealing with a financial crisis at home, existing wars abroad and can't afford to commit to further loss of life and to finding the many millions of dollars to fund a full involvement in yet another conflict.

Sarah Palin's simplistic "solutions" don't take the complexities of the situation into account at all. As she is now an "expert" in foreign relations, her attacks on the president will escalate and her soundbites become more poisonous, but still lack any substance or any understanding of how things work in the real world.

Jason Easley has a very good article
about Sarah Palin's views on Israel, Iran and how she's losing it.