Showing posts with label rhetoric. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rhetoric. Show all posts

Monday, 11 April 2011

Reflections on Sarah Palin, the Media and Civilized Society


The comments on the post "Sarah Palin Strikes Again," published yesterday, made me reflect on why I still write about her. I don't think she's going to run for the presidency, she's not a viable candidate.

But Sarah Palin is dangerous. She may be an idiot, prone to word salad, bad sartorial choices and a questionable taste in hairstyles, all the things that make her an object of ridicule around the world. She's not dangerous on her own, the danger comes from the fact that she has strong allies in the media.

What? The "lamestream media?" Yes, the very same lamestream media she whines about all the time are her strongest allies.

They gave her a voice when they reported her every tweet, every Facebook note and discussed her TV appearances as if they had come from somebody who had something substantial to say. They not only allowed, but actively inserted her "death panels" into the healthcare reform debate. If they had ignored her and allowed her idiotic pronouncements to fall into a void, she wouldn't be a danger at all. Sarah Palin is a mouthpiece, a poster girl doing somebody else's bidding. She's the "pretty" face of a very ugly movement.


Do the media do it for the ratings, do they do it out of greed? Or are they part of the movement to discredit the president? There are honorouble members of the media who do call her out on her most egregious statements, who ridicule her because they find her ridiculous indeed. But their attempts get mixed with all the rest, with all the reports that don't question her idiocy, that validate her views by presenting them as having substance.

Sarah Palin has poisoned the political dialogue and has shifted the political debate to a very ugly place. The media gave her the power to do so. They have empowered her puppetmasters in the process and that's the real danger.

When Obama was elected, I thought the ugly face of America would become a thing of the past. America had elected a black president in a country where not so long ago black people were sent to the back of the bus.

I don't agree with every decision president Obama makes and I don't consider him to be left wing, not by any stretch of the imagination. But Obama is a compassionate man who believes in society, who believes that government exists to serve the people.

What do Sarah Palin and her bosses believe in? They believe that government should be small, that taxes and services should be cut, that programs to which people have paid into all their working lives are entitlement programs. They believe that healthcare is for the rich, that the insurance companies can play god and determine who lives and who dies, based on money alone. They believe that the mega rich are more worthy of reward than the less well-off hard working people. Taxes are for the poor, the middle class, not for the people who can afford to pay them. The only sacred thing is the military: "We win, they lose."

America leads the world, but it's still a country where the religious right calls the shots, where the rich have more rights than the poor and where there's a misguided belief that America should spread its wings and dictate to other countries how they should conduct themselves. It reminds me of society in the Dark Ages. The poor had to pay their dues to the Church to go to heaven and to the nobility in return for protection against invading hordes from other kingdoms.

It's inconceivable (in this day and age) for a first world country to have a tiny number of "haves" and a vast majority of "have-nots." It's truly unbelievable that in a modern society many people could be left to die or to go without healthcare because it's considered an privilege. It's obscene to have a first world country allowing profit-making insurance companies to play with people's lives, extracting every last cent from a hard working population while denying them the services they paid for at the drop of a hat. It's inhumane to treat the poor as an inconvenient nuisance.

President Obama tried to address this. He tried to take America out of the dark ages and bring the country to more equitable conditions, in line with the rest of the developed world. Here is a man who believes in a civilized, modern society.


The America Sarah Palin would like to see would not be a civilized, modern country. It would be a barbaric society, without compassion, without regard for other human beings, without regard for nature, where the only regard would be for money and power. Countries would be invaded and God would be invoked to give the powerful an aura of righteousness.

The media gave power to her violent rhetoric, to her vitriolic attacks on the president, they gave her words a weight they do not deserve.

I despise certain aspects of America as a country, I despise the cult of money and the religious lunacy, I fear her military might and the tendency to shove "democracy" down the throats of people in other countries, but I've learned to love Americans. That's why I will still write about Sarah Palin and try to counter her poisonous barbs agaisnt those who believe society should be better for all. I will continue to expose her phony political record.

I will also continue to denounce the media that have neglected their duty to investigate Sarah Palin's lies: Her record as well as the faked pregnancy. They have given her too much power and she feels free to derail any attempt at civilized political debate.

Saturday, 8 January 2011

Sarah Palin and coincidences - Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords shot in Arizona

Sarah Palin doesn’t believe in coincidences. She wrote these words in Going Rogue and repeated them in her speech at College of the Ozarks in Missouri.

Going Rogue:

Palin posits her faith as the pillar of her career, as if her successes have unfolded according to a grand divine plan. Her selection as McCain's running mate was a "natural progression," she writes in one section. "I don't believe in coincidences," she writes in another.


Live tweet of speech at Ozarks:

Palin is talking about work ethic & pushing one's self to better their lives. "I don't believe in coincidences," she said.

Today, one such coincidence came true.

crosshairs targets giffords


giffords news article

(UPDATE: According to latest news, Rep. Giffords has survived the attack,
the surgery was successful)

We don't know yet if the shootings were politically motivated, but in a country where carrying a gun is fiercely protected by the Constitution and where weapons are too easily available, publishing a picture depicting crosshairs and making a list of targets is incredibly irresponsible.

I drew attention to the fact that Sarah Palin doesn't believe in coincidences because, according to her own rhetoric, this violent act would translate as "One down, nineteen to go."

+++

Note by Patrick:



Regina wrote back then:

This is frightening. It started with bricks, now they're cleaning their rifles, ready to reload.

The sight of blood seems to excite Sarah Palin, be it the blood of wolves, bears, moose or caribou.

She has moved to human targets... Sarah Palin needs to stop, sit down and shut up.

Here is Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords on MSNBC in her own words about the Tea Party-threats against her, the violent atmosphere which is being created and the attacks against her office:


Short link to the youtube clip for tweeting:


This is a chilling interview.

Rep. Giffords even mentions Sarah Palin and her cross-hair target list in this interview.

The interview aired on March 25, 2010.

Rep. Giffords:

“Sarah Palin has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district and when people do that, they’ve gotta realize there are consequences to that action.”
+++

Here is the live stream from MSNBC:


From the police press conference:
"There were several prominent individuals in the crowd."
"There was a poster for Gabrielle Giffords and several flyers."
+++

The latest reports say that Rep. Gabrielle Giffords is still alive.

There are reports that Palin's infamous "RELOAD" tweet has beeb scrubbed, is this true?

This one:

sp reload 2

+++

MORE UPDATES:

Regina wanted to post this earlier, but it got lost because I edited the post at the same time as her:

Sarah Palin was quick off the mark:

Palin condolences
+++

More details about the shooter which have been discovered:

Jared Loughner has been named as the shooter, though it appears that there was at least one more shooter.

He has a youtube account, and it appears to me that this second youtube account which contains only one very, very creepy clip which he favorited in the other account also belongs to him.

He clearly is severely mentally disturbed and does seem to have distinct anti-Government views, also strong views about a "new currency" (gold), which is also a very popular theme in militia-circles. Due to the fact that he cites some "left-wing books" in his youtube profile and somebody else (who hasn't seem him since 2007!) said that he was "left-wing and quite liberal", it now appears that the "meme" by the right-wingers, expressed on websites and comments is that the shooter was just another "evil liberal." This is pure nonsense, and dangerous as well, as the views expressed in his youtube clips have nothing to do at all with being left-wing and liberal, and he cites "Mein Kampf" amongst his favorite books as well.

EDIT: New information confirms that Jared Loughner was not a liberal, but could be more described as a "libertarian", which is a completely different thing.

This didn't stop Sarah Palin's propaganda battalion at Conservatives4Palin to immediately start spreading the false meme that the shooter was a liberal, treating it as a fact, of course:

C4P - Shooter was liberal

In his youtube clips, he seems to be obsessed with grammar, mind control, the constitution, federal government and a "new currency." An example (without sound):




Screenshots from his youtube clips:

Jared Loughner youtube 1

Jared Loughner youtube 3

Jared Loughner youtube 4

Jared Loughner youtube 6

Jared Loughner youtube 7

Jared Loughner youtube 5

Jared Loughner youtube 2


Jared Loughner also had a myspace-profile, but it was scrapped virtually immediately!

This is a screenshot from his scrapped myspace-profile:

Myspace screenshot


EDIT: Please note that I have removed the screenshot of a facebook profile which I had posted here earlier. It was suggested that the profile picture might not have been Jared Loughner.

In addition, please note that there are "rumors"about a "Palin and Tea Party" related facebook profile floating around, but this was a fake facebook profile which was created yesterday for a "Jared Laughner" by some angry person, after the name of the shooter was first reported as "Laughner."

Here is a genuine picture of him which was published by an online news site:

Jared Loughner pic 5


It's an unspeakable tragedy that this has happened.

+++


This is the most chilling picture he had in his account:

Jared-Lee-Loughner_myspace 2


He left this message on myspace very shortly before the shooting, earlier today:

Jared Loughner - Last message on myspace

+++

UPDATE:

According to the latest news, Rep. Giffords has survived the attack, the surgery was successful.

+++


Bullseye follow-up
+++

UPDATE:

CBS News published an excellent article about the shooting and the controversy surrounding Sarah Palin.

+++

UPDATE:

The "Coalition to stop gun violence" shows a shocking timeline on their website, providing details about politically charged gun crimes and other violent acts, as well as examples of violent political rhetoric. The starting date of the timeline is June 26, 2008, when the US Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision embraced the National Rifle Association's contention that the Second Amendment provides individuals with the right to take violent action against our government should it become "tyrannical."

+++

UPDATE:

Note by Regina: I have created a short video which I hope encapsulates our feelings about these events and makes it easier to share them.



+++

UPDATE BY PATRICK:

Anyone who thinks that this incident will stop Sarah Palin and her fanatic followers is sadly mistaken. Palin and her fans are pathological - rationality or reflection plays no role, but only obsession with their own importance and power.

Sheya from the C4P-site "PalinTV" tweeted this two hours ago:

PalinTV Reload tweet

I doubt very much that this is a "minority opinion." As usual, these people see poor Sarah as a victim.

C4P was quick to spread the lie that the shooter Jared Loughner was a left-winger, a liberal (see my comments and links above). Also, in an appalling interview with Palin's "facebook manager" Rebecca Mansour, Palin's fanatical cheerleader Tammy Bruce ranted over and over again about "disgusting", "reprehensible", "sick", "depraved" liberals who had the audacity to hold Palin responsible for creating an atmosphere of violence.

Sarah Palin won't be stopped by this. Only the exposure of her twisted personality and of her many scandals will finally be the end of her political career. I know that this may be hard to believe, but I am convinced that it's the truth.

+++

UPDATE:


A possible link between Jared Lee Loughner, the primary suspect in the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, and American Renaissance, the publication of an anti-immigration group, offers potential new insights into what may have caused the 22-year-old Arizonan to carry out the attack, which killed six people and wounded more than a dozen outside a Tucson, Ariz. stripmall on Saturday.

The shooting attack gravely wounded Representative Giffords and killed her aide Gabriel Zimmerman, US District Judge John Roll, a nine-year-old girl, and three others. The hail of gunfire shocked the nation and reinvigorated scrutiny of rancor and anger-fueled debate in American politics.

On Sunday, Fox News quoted a Department of Homeland Security memo that states Mr. Loughner is "possibly linked" to American Renaissance, which DHS says promotes views that are "anti-government, anti-immigration, anti-ZOG [Zionist Occupational Government], anti-Semitic." Both Giffords and Mr. Zimmerman are Jewish.

American Renaissance is the publication of the The New Century Foundation, described by the Anti-Defamation League as a "self-styled think tank." The ADL, on its website, calls American Renaissance a "white supremacist journal and companion Website" that "promotes pseudoscientific studies that attempt to demonstrate the intellectual and cultural superiority of whites and publishes articles on the supposed decline of American society because of integrationist social policies."

EDIT: "American Renaissance" strongly deny that there is a connection between them and the shooter Jared Loughner.

+++

UPDATE:

The website "bluewavenews" published a good overview about violent Tea Party rhetoric in light of the current events:

Tea Party Rhetoric: “Nothing better than a dead liberal”

This clip speak for itself:



+++

UPDATE:

Here is a copy of the original federal "Criminal Complaint" against Jared Lee Loughner.

He bought the gun only on November 30, 2010.

Excerpt:

Loughner federal criminal complaint - screenshot
+++

UPDATE:

Tina Dupuy ("Sarah Palin's enemy list") published a very good new post: At Least Stand By Your Free Speech

+++

We have received a recording of 911 calls related to the shooting in Arizona. Please be aware that these calls are distressing to listen to.

One caller describes that the shooter Jared Loughner was wearing a "beanie, a hooded sweatshirt and jeans."

Listen here:



+++

UPDATE:


+++

Dave Weigel published an excellent take-down of Sarah Palin's "reload-rhetoric" and the "surveyor marks" defence of her fans and her staff:

Among the people who gave the impression that these were targets: Sarah Palin. When she announced the list in a tweet, she wrote "don't retreat, instead - RELOAD!" I'm not an expert surveyor, but I'm not sure what sort of tools need reloading. Jonathan Martin points out that after the election, Palin tweeted about her success (18 of the seats went to the GOP) by saying "remember months ago 'bullseye' icon used 2 target the 20 Obamacare-lovin' incumbent seats?" Throughout 2010, when Palin was criticized for the target map, she either didn't respond or mocked the "lamestream media" for interpreting her gun metaphors as calls for violence. At the Southern Republican Leadership Conference, for example, she got big applause when she said "Don't retreat, reload -- and that is not a call for violence!" The media wasn't going to force her to stop using the gun line.

Palin doubled down, and she had a lot of support from conservatives for doing so, because a lot of them considered the "target map" criticism a bad faith attack on her. Were some of the attacks in bad faith? Maybe. But Gabrielle Giffords had specifically raised her concerns about the target map. Palin had many, many months to stop using the "reload" line, or to identify the targets as "surveyor's symbols," and she didn't do that.

Following the suggestion of one of our readers, I tweeted:

Palingates surveyor marks tweet

.

Saturday, 3 April 2010

Sarah Palin is an opportunist - cynical and dangerous

Aides to Sarah Palin have asked the Republican National Committee to remove her name from an invitation that suggests she might attend a series of committee fundraising events timed to coincide with next week's Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans.

Though Palin will speak on Friday at the SRLC, a gathering of top Republican officials and an early cattle call for potential 2012 presidential candidates, the former Alaska governor will not be participating in any RNC fundraising event, a Palin adviser told CNN.

It's difficult to make sense of the moves made by Sarah Palin's camp. Some decisions and statements from former aides were already a bit chaotic, but Meg Stapleton seemed more predictable. Since Meg was pushed under the bus by Jason Recher, things have become even more puzzling.

We have to keep jumping back and forth to guess what the master plan might be. What's driving the bus forward? Politics? Money? Religion?

Sarah Palin went rogue on purpose. Without any particular allegiance, she can slip into whatever mode seems more profitable at the time. She supported some Republican candidates and became the Queen of the Teabaggers, pushing her simplistic anti-government agenda. She tried to be the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan, but hasn't mentioned his name in a long time, so perhaps that didn't work out very well.

Sarah Palin has been exploring a number of different avenues since she quit as governor for the good of Alaska. Author, Fox News contributor, TV presenter, speaker, Facebook blogger, twitterer. Her main aim is to stay in the headlines. If a controversy is not readily available, she creates one. And she has props for each occasion. Her family, Alaska, the Republicans, the Teabaggers, God, unborn children, Israel, the military... they are all props.

SarahPac made some eleventh hour token donations to political candidates in order to justify its existence, but in reality it seems to be a nice piggy bank for Sarah Palin and her cronies.

Sarah Palin is a cynical opportunist. If she made her money in the same way as Octomom or the Gosselins, if she grew an extra head and became a freakshow, if she decided to fake another fifteen pregnancies for a reality show, if she made millions of dollars from any of these things, all would be well. The problem is that politics is her main theme. That's why she's dangerous.

targets

This following was no.5 in the top ten 2009 editorial cartoons in the TIME annual competition:



Sarah Palin already appears in several other categories. I hope her targets and inflammatory rhetoric won't find their way into some sinister list in 2010.



She's not the only dangerous person around but seems to be one of the most pernicious and high profile among many. Others may have genuine concerns and are driven by their fears. Sarah Palin's sole motivation appears to be money and she doesn't care about the consequences of her poisonous statements, it's all about her bank balance...

Take the money away and Sarah Palin, with her "servant's heart," would sit down and shut up very quickly.

(Our friend Ennealogic has a very good and very graphic analysis of Sarah Palin's metaphors)

.

Friday, 19 March 2010

Sarah Palin and Violence


By Kathleen

Sarah Palin has a problem and her problem is with anyone who does not believe in her small town view of an America in which God’s Law is paramount. As she sees it, unless the rest of America falls in line with her view, then they are non-believers and haters who must be stood up against. So deep-set is her belief that she consistently runs with the narrative that because people hate her then she must be a victim. A victim persecuted for her love of a God who will soon reveal his mighty power to all of us. Sarah believes that that judgment day is near as we are living in the “End Times” and she is preparing herself for the battle to come. I don’t have a problem with this. Sarah’s religious views belong to her. Do I think that her views are unreasonable? Yes, I do. But that is my personal opinion and she is more than welcome to take care of her own spiritual soul. I’m comfortable with mine.

However, my concern regarding Sarah is a much more elementary one because she has another shield and it is one which she wields very effectively. She’s not just on a mission for God. She’s on a mission to save America from “big government” and it is the political weapons that she has chosen which most concern me. Fundamentally, Sarah’s supporters see her as a martyr preparing to set herself against a system of “big government” which has lost its way. She has armed herself with language. A language of division, fear and resentment, couched in frustration and one that essentially promotes violence - violence that is on the verge of escalation without reason and which is very close to spilling over into becoming physical, as reported by The Redoubt Reporter:

Jenny Neyman / Redoubt Reporter
Michigan Militia founder Norm Olson, left, and master of ceremonies Bob Bird, both of Nikiski, at last week's Second Amendment/Constitutional Task Force rally in Kenai.

A recent meeting in Kenai, Alaska of the Second Amendment Constitutional Task Force began in a friendly enough manner but soon disintegrated into bitterness and inflammatory rhetoric when Schaeffer Cox, of Fairbanks, announced that “something horrible was going on” as he implied that America was presently run by a tyrant. He went on to say:

“My greatest fear is that they’re not going to hear us until we speak to them in their language, which is force,” Cox said. “… We would be doing a wrong, bad thing if we skipped over all those other forms of force and we jumped right to bloody force, but right now, America is headed to bloody force. If we sit on our hands until it hits the fan and it’s go time, we won’t be able to exercise that warlike force with a clear conscience. So we need to be very faithful with what’s at hand right now.” And:

“I am not opposed to violent, bloody force. I know that is hard to say to a big group of people. It sounds kind of bad but that is something that we’ve got to reckon with. That is a duty that we have as an individual, as people who have families and friends.”

I watched Sarah last night on the Glenn Beck show as she followed Beck's call and denounced the use of physical violence whilst at the same time dropping in her code words of fear, desperation and unheard voices.


Furthermore, in the interview, Sarah reveals to a shocked somewhat bemused Glenn that "she doesn't pretend to be a believer in everything that she reads in the media. Not in the ADN or other aspects of the mainstream/lamestream media." She continues to say, "I won't pretend that everything is taken in context." She's read enough "to know that violence isn't the answer but that there is legitimate frustration with Government today" and thinks that "those who assembled at that meeting in Kenai, what they were saying is that there is some desperation out there in society and citizens want to know what they can do to have their voices heard. Violence is not the answer though."

It’s good to know that Sarah believes that “violence is not the answer”. What I’d like to know is can we now expect to see a change in Sarahs’ violence contaminated rhetoric? Or is she still going to employ the media to inveigh America with her particular brand of shrill and divisive discourse which is designed to limit rational discussion? I watched Sarah closely during this particular interview and I do not believe that we will see any drastic change in her message. You can see it in her manner and in her cold eyes. You can hear it in her venomous responses to Glenn. She understands their violent nature and fears because she is one of them.


Further reading on ADN

(Please read the previous post and help if you can. Thank you)

.