Still on the recurring theme of $arah Palin's lies, could we have an explanation as to why she caused the sticky constitutional mess if she had been planning to resign for quite sometime?
In her gasping resignation speech, $arah said: "Let's just say, this decision has been in the works for a while..."
So why didn't she arrange the lieutenant governor business a bit better? $he had plenty of time to consult with Joe Schmidt regarding this issue. It would be interesting to learn his reasons for turning down a job he sought only four months ago.
How long is a while? Was the Legislature still in session? They could have voted on her new choice of lieutenant governor without the need for a special session.
I think this "while" of hers means less than 24 hours. $arah Palin's resignation was very abrupt, her demeanour and gasping did not reflect "much consideration", as she put it in her speech.
The rumours about her reasons to step down may have died down, but the reasons remain, whether we know what they are or not.
Ethics complaints? Media? Bloggers? Naah...
Launching her campaign for president in 2012? I don't think she would have been so pissed-off and breathless if this was the case. $he would have given a triumphant speech, not a whining, gasping one, even if she didn't admit to a future presidential run at the time.
Is she going to pursue a career in the media, cash in while the going is good? Again, her tone didn't reflect it.
$arah Palin lied on July 3 and has lied many times since then. We're used to it. Her tweets are getting weirder by the minute, she's gone all Greek on us.
I still believe the other Franco Sarto is going to drop at some point...
.
