Sarah Palin, then 44 years old, 5' 4" tall, 7 months pregnant with her 5th child.
Giselle Bundchen, 29 years old, 5' 11" tall, 7 months pregnant with her 1st child.
Honestly! Models are very slack with their abs. We recently saw photographs of Heidi Klum very pregnant with shameful abs, not tight at all. Now look at Giselle Bundchen, how could she let herself go like this?
252 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 252 of 252Amy 1-If I remember right, she had someone taking phototgraphs of her license plates, and she felt threatened so pulled her blog.
S.H.
"little guarantee of any substantial payoff."
You cannot be serious. The existence of Trig is essentially Sarah Palin's raison d'etre as a politician and certainly was one of the top 2 reasons for her inclusion on the McCain ticket. Please. Nice try.
I was reading at Talking Points Memo today. They have a lot of back pages about Palin. (I was trying to find their photo montage "STILL CRAZY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS" which included the turkey photos.
Anyway, if you haven't checked out TPMuckraker, it's worth a few searches for SP material.
It also has the history of the "death panel" meme, which in no way originated with Mrs. Palin. She was the fourth person to push it and not the last.
SH, she also had threats of family dirty laundry being exposed, I think the license plate thing was just the last straw. I emailed with her a few times before she shut down her personal email. She said that if SP had nothing to hide, she couldn't imagine why she was being targeted. ITA. Personally I don't care what dirty laundry she had...she was a damn good photo editor. She made me see things I hadn't noticed, with just lights and arrows.
""" Anonymous said...
"little guarantee of any substantial payoff."
You cannot be serious. The existence of Trig is essentially Sarah Palin's raison d'etre as a politician and certainly was one of the top 2 reasons for her inclusion on the McCain ticket. Please. Nice try.
"""
However, we must surmise that there is no way Sarah Palin could have known John McCain would pick here as VP. You're putting the cart before the horse. Sarah Palin was already a succesful politician before Trig's birth. Why would she risk that success on the hope that she could increase her VP chances?
If she had plotted and got away with it, it increases her chances just a little bit, if at all. However, if she is caught, she is done in politics forever.
JC - Trig was born much earlier than April 18th, as evidenced by the photo of Mercede holding very TINY Trig (with Sarah, called "mommy-in-law") on Mercede Johnston's myspace page (I am sure someone can provide that link). THEN, Trig was "presented" on April 18th, bigger, rosier, haler -as evidenced when she brought him to her office a couple of days later. It gets confusing because Sarah SAID Trig was born April 18th after the wild plane ride, but little Trig WAS born earlier. Likely he was in a neo-natal unit for awhile, due to being a Down's premie with hole in heart.
I hope I am not out of line in answering your question - but you seem sincere with this inquiry.
BTW JC - I think her motive was pure - i.e., to protect her daughter. I do not fault her at all for doing so - it is the constant LYING about the whole thing, ad nauseum, that is so disgusting. Had she just said that she adopted Trig and that it was a private matter (not open for discussion) I think everyone would have been fine with that - and admired her for that. But noooooooo.
Ahh, me thinks we now have a kinder and gentler troll/operative who seeks to toy with us further.
For the record, we are all aware that SP announced her "pregnancy" the DAY AFTER McCain got the GOP nomination in early March '08.
My, my, she couldn't have possibly known that she would be selected as the VP candidate(or was on the short list)--oh no, heavens, how could we possibly think that ?
and YES, we understand that when the truth about this pregnancy comes out, SP will be in even bigger trouble than she is now. That is why JC is here, protecting his investment. Too bad, you should have invested with Bernard Madoff instead.
Jesse:
You're running under the assumption that the birth dates that ONLY Sarah says to be true. There's no birth dates in what you call the "official" statement from the doctor. Tripp wasn't seen until late February. On the birth announcements she sent out to her friends there wasn't even a date of birth listed on it. Does that sound reasonable? Who sends out birth announcements with no date? Show me one from anyone who has done that before. It kind of flies in the face of the term "birth announcement"
So your first theory hinges on 8 months which can't be proved anywhere. Remember that this is apparently a very fertile family. Sarah had Track '89 and Bristol in '90. So there's a precedent set by the Queen herself of having 2 births within a year.
The rest of your theory falls into place as all being advantageous to her once you get past the dates ONLY she has stated. It's already been established that she's a pathological liar, so we aren't quite so quick to jump on believing what only she says.
There's a reason why a reporter set out to prove she WAS the mother of Trigg as stonewalled. There's a reason why she won't release any official records and there's a reason why there's no birth date on her birth announcements given to her closest friends and staff. I'll leave it up to you to figure out what that reason is
Some of you here must think me some villian. Do you think that, really in your hearts of hearts? By deleting some of my posts you elminate a dissenting opinion, something this blog desparately needs. I looked around and saw one collective thought process. No differing opinions. Not differences that actually matter. Now wouldn't any of you just like to see a point of view that is little different now and then? I know I do. It keeps me on my toes, mentally that is.
Did I ask questions? Yes. Did I repeat myself occasionally? Yes. But no more than other people do, I think. So you don't like my copying and posting other people's posts-that is the best way to reply I believe. I did post several times in a row, but only because of Blogger's limitations.
So I pushed the envelope. That's what you have to do with free speech sometimes. I guess I have a thick skin, and sometimes I am guilty of imposing that attribute onto others. It takes a lot to rile me up. A lot. If you knew me in person, you would know that. Every last one of you could insult me in the worst way imaginable and it would not affect me.
Now I can see things from your point of view. Most of you think I have broken the "official" rules around here. That's not my intent. So I'll try to accomodate them in the future.
It goes without saying that that my political viewpoint is different from most of you. However, if you really want civil discourse, then I am open to it. Always have been. I may challenge your assertions, but isn't that something you should want?
That's all I have to say right now. I'll be posting some more, but please feel to delete me posts. I really don't mind.
"However, we must surmise that there is no way Sarah Palin could have known John McCain would pick here as VP"
That's not true. Actually the McCain-Palin connection goes back to her days as Mayor when she was lobbying Washington for some big money to Wasilla. Which by the way she got thanks to a bill McCain slipped the pork into at the last minute. He also met with her in 2006, for what we don't know. Even he has admitted talking to her at various Governors conferences well before he won the nomination. By the way, the scarves showed up the day AFTER he won the nomination. Coincidence?
Anon @ 10-26-09 @ 22:47, that was an excellent picture of the 7 mo pregnant fitness coach! A scarf would not be able to cover up that preggo belly!
Actually Barb @ 04:18, she began wearing the scarves consistently beginning 2-19-08, after the strange 2-15-08 weekend in Fairbanks. She announced her "pregnancy" on 3-5-08, the day AFTER McCain won the Republican nomination on 3-4-08.
Barb Dwyer, you seem to be knowledgable about this. You ask questions, so maybe I can provide some answers.
You're right. We have no birth certificate. Yet do you suppose Sarah Palin will produce one for any of you? I wouldn't. If I were in her place, I might produce one if a major cable tv show began running with story as a fact.
Playing devil's advocate though, if Sarah Palin was a pathological liar and fraud, why not simply forge a birth certificate? It couldn't be as hard as faking a pregnancy.
Also, I have something interesting I found. Apparantly, a good reason you didn't see pictures of Tripp Palin was because both Bristol and Levi were being offered over a $100,000 for exclusive photographs. May explain a few things.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/29/bristol-palin-baby-son-tr_n_154081.html
I researched the bus vandalism stories and found that there are two different acts of vandalism.
The event Track might be/was involved in was on November 29, 2005. The MatSu Borough School District buses were targeted. The engine heat blocks were unplugged, tires deflated and mirrors broken. This is the incident involving Deryk Harris, who was 18, and three other minors, one of which is rumored to be Track. David Coon was another boy involved. Track would have been 16 at the time.
The other incident was earlier, on March 17, 2003. In that incident, vandals cut brake lines on 50 buses in the Eagle River and Chugrak fleet of buses. With a 4/20/89 birthdate, Track would have been almost 14 at the time of this incident, so his involvement with this incident is not as likely as with the 2005 incident.
(sorry for the lack of links, its late.)
Jesse C. - I do not think you are a "villian," just ill-informed and perhaps having a difficult time realizing that Palin is not what you imagined her to be. I had to go through the same realizations concerning Sarah - I am a Conservative female who was very excited and elated when I first saw her on the stage (at the Republican convention). My heart sank when she failed so miserably in her interviews with Couric and Charlie. But, I still hung on to my first impression, ever hopeful.
Then I started to investigate her record - I cannot stress this enough Jesse- PLEASE take the time to read through all of the "gates" listed at the right. The information Regina provides is backed up with facts, links, videos and tapes. Please read through them and perhaps you will awaken to the sad truth - SP is in NO WAY qualified to be in political office. I wish her well-no hate here at all. But I will do all I can to inform the public of her lack of abilities to be in any elected position.
Barb Dwyer 4:18 -- The New Yorker says McCain talked to SP at only ONE gov's conf: do you have add'l info?
McCain had met Palin once, but their conversation—at a reception during a meeting of the National Governors Association, six months earlier—had lasted only fifteen minutes. “It wasn’t a real conversation,” said the longtime friend, who called the choice of Palin “the fucking most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.” Aides arranged a phone call between McCain and Palin, and scrutinized her answers to some seventy items on a questionnaire that she had filled out. But McCain didn’t talk with Palin in person again until the morning of Thursday, August 28th. Palin was flown down to his retreat in Sedona, Arizona, and they spoke for an hour or two. By the time he announced her as his choice, the next day, he had spent less than three hours in her company.
(5th paragraph from bottom.)
You're right. We have no birth certificate. Yet do you suppose Sarah Palin will produce one for any of you?
**********
Not for us. However, when you're harrassing the editor of by far the largest newpaper in the state (he released the email exchange) to write a story verifying Trigs birth. Then said editor sends out a reporter to talk to the family about it and try to verify it somehow and that reporter gets stonewalled. According to the editor "she received very little cooperation in her efforts from the parties who, in my judgment, stood to benefit most from the story, namely you and your family." It becomes very suspicious no?
He wasn't pursuing the story, she was harrassing him to write the article. Yet no one would speak to the reporter TRYING to help her. Like everything she does, it doesn't add up and makes no sense.
As for forging the birth certificate. You know as well as I do that would open up a whole new can of worms. Sarah LOVES to be vindicated because so much of what she says and does is always proven not to be true. If she could stop this rumor to which (I will quote the editor of ADN again) "we have been amazed by the widespread and enduring quality of these rumors", she would in an instant. But of course she can't
One of the participants in the bus vandalism, or his Mom, I forget, said Track was not involved. Not that I know what THAT means. But I bet Levi knows the actual facts. But the more he tells, the less leverage he retains. Better to focus on making money right now.
Patrick has posted a new blog post.
my w/v is rante
JC-
why would Sarah Palin, whom you would certainly characterise as a loving mother, I'm guessing -- 'out' her minor child during what should have been a private and personal time for Bristol? You say that Palin will only release a birth certificate when she can 'embarrass' the MSM substantially enough. But that holds no water due to the acutely annoying fact that the MSM has never picked up on it to begin with.
Also -- wouldn't any truly selfless and caring mother say "well, I'd have liked to save this ace in the hole awhile longer...but I refuse to sacrifice my daughter just so I can get in a good dig at the media later"?
I'm sorry but throwing Bristol under the bus simply cannot be explained away in any scenario that EXcludes a lie/hoax/conspiracy.
And you copying my comment and then saying 'she didn't throw Bristol under the bus' is NOT a defense of these actions.
I swore I was not going to spend any more time on you, but I find myself wondering if you might actually have your mind opened just the tiniest bit.
You saw the infamous gusty photos, I presume. How is it that a woman with what can only be called a 'huge' pregnant belly be photographed only a few days later with NO apparent belly? How could a woman whose belly was nearly as big around as she was tall in the gusty photos get on FOUR interstate flights just a few days later and not have one -not ONE!- of the more than dozen flight attendants even notice that she WAS pregnant. How probable is that? Do you know HOW observant flight attendents are trained to be since 9/11? That not a SINGLE flight staffer or passenger noticed that giant belly displayed in the gusty photos (and NOWHERE else) does bear scrutiny, even if you are loathe to admit it.
I don't want you to simply paste my comments and call them illogical fallacy. I want you as a person to look at those gusty photos and ask yourself if there is any remote probability that out of FOUR flights...not one flight attendant noticed there was a massively pregnant woman on board -- and on the two returning flights, nobody out of how many dozens of people noticed there was a woman IN LABOUR? Have you educated yourself on what occurs physically once the amniotic sac is ruptured, even with a "slow leak"? It is a messy, messy business.
And the very bottom line -- would Sarah Palin, a woman ostensibly educated on pregnancy and childbirth having been through four prior births including at least one labour which took substantially LESS time than the 29 hours between when her water allegedly broke and she gave birth... to piper, right? Who has that little article with piper's birth announcement, where they talk about being in love with her and what her name meant? I believe they mention when she went into labour and the birth announcement had the time of birth -- and the difference added up to something like 14 hours or something...which is long for a fourth labour...if anyone has that link I would appreciate it. Anyway...what are the odds that a woman in such circumstances would risk birthing a very, VERY sick premature infant in the SKY?
Continued below, talked too much -- LOL
So she wanted him born in Alaska, right? Hideous reason for risking your sick preemie's LIFE as well as your own -- but ok, fine...WHY did she drive past the hospital in Anchorage to one that was NOT equipped to handle dire complications should they occur?
You say it's none of our business.
If she was pregnant, she took risks that fall into the realm of not just neglect but flat out abuse. That is my business, based on my belief that adults need to be advocates for children at risk of abuse by their supposed caregivers.
If she wasn't pregnant, she has undertaken a nest of pitical lies outranked only by perhaps the warren commission. And since she believes she should have a direct hand in the laws which govern my country -- her lying in such a way is most DEFINITELY my business.
I'm trying to see you as human Jesse, and not as the robotic entity you have presented here.
Can you provide any ACTUAL insight as to what your opinions are based upon? Not the same regurgitated lines you've said over and over; ACTUAL thought processes and opinions. I really hope my reissue of faith in you is not misplaced.
It's also interesting that Palin has already been warned once in '05 by an Anchorage Superior Court Judge (John Suddock), that "disparaging" of relatives "would not be tolerated," calling it "a form of child abuse."
http://www.newsweek.com/id/158140
So apparently her statement of "I'll do whatever I want until the courts tell me I can't" is a lie too
she has no shame. That's a form of sociopathy frequently seen in NPD.
Amy1:
I'm assuming that article is related to the '08 conference, although I couldn't find anything that specifically stated '08. It was a long article though, that opened in this little box, so I just quickly scanned it. Here's a well researched timeline that disputes that first meeting was in '08. However, I'll look for another link to that event for more info.
http://jotman.blogspot.com/2008/09/palin-timeline.html
I have been around these blogs since last December and have heard or been part of many many discussions relating to the supposed pregnancy. This latest side by side comparison is undisputable in my opinion. We can verify the date the picture was taken, it is a picture easily found out there in google land, and it clearly shows a flat stomach compared to a natural looking pregnant belly. Nicely done.
Why did she beg Levi and Bristol to let her adopt the baby? So she could pretend that abstinence works and her family is under control. It is her Fundie cred that got her the nomination after all. Dobson approved.
NO matter which baby you think Levi is referring to.
Bill Kristol was hyping Palin long before McCain. The machine wanted her for fundie votes because McCain pretends, but he is NOT religious at all and the fundies were not happy with McCain. WITH Miss Wasilla, the fundies got in line.
McCain wanted Lieberman, the GOP machine wanted Palin. She knew that.
JC: All the questions you ask have been covered for a year now on palinsdeceptions and here and at BreePalin. Please read through what is on the record, with links and supporting FACTS.
Then come here with your questions. We are happy to hear an opposing view, but it is tiresome to have to hear the BS all over again and pull the links, yada yada when this info is available.
And Please, if anyone hear tries to post anything, even a simple fair question on a Palin blog, you are immediately banned.
opiniions, opinions.
Everyone is entitled.
Especially when someone swallows down one of Sarahs whopper whole.
Jesse: You are thinking about this because of what we know NOW.
Keep in mind, when this plot was hatched, Sarah and family didn't know she would be in the National Media's glare. At the time, though reckless, it was only a story in AK.
It would be easy to put the story out there and then ride out the rumors until another story came along..... unfortunately, the next story to come along was Sarah as VP Candidate.... bringing MORE attention to her rather than less.
I still find it unbelievable that the people of Wasilla have circled the wagons on this, and that nobody has spoken out one way or the other. A lab tech? The person who actually did the ultra-sound/amnio? A clerk at a drug-store? Somebody who sold her baby equipment? A Walmart shopper excited at seeing the Governor? (after all there is a pic of her and Bristol in the Walmart check-out; was this a photo-op or a normal event?) .... There should be many people, everyday people, who could confirm either Bristol or Sarah being pregnant, no?
It's like 'Children of the Corn' up there~!!!
Gee whiz, another true believer. 8 months he sez.
Excuse me while I lol.
What's glaringly obvious to me is that no one will ever get to the "bottom" of SP and of the Trig mystery or of any of the other "gates" *IF* they start from the assumption that Sarah is a rational actor.
She seems (to me) to have a serious personality disorder; other people have mentioned NPD or she could have ASPD (anti-social personality disorder). The more I read up on people with this sort of mental illness, the more it seems to fit: the disordered thinking and speech, the obsessive vindictiveness, the lying when the truth would serve her better, the aggressive need to be in the center of attention, an unnatural disregard for others including her children, her promiscuous, inappropriate flirting and attire, etc.
I haven't come across one statement of hers that didn't contain a lie. I know politicians often lie, or bend the truth, but hers must be some sort of record: there doesn't seem to be any sort of event or "accomplishment" in her life that she has been straight about, or that she has concluded successfully. Even the car wash turned into disaster.
So to ask "why would SP [do X, Y or Z]?" is possibly futile. She has her own disordered and unfathomable reasons, IMO.
-leila
P.S.
Since her problems (if they are what I think they are, above) are innate and organic, she can't help herself, nor can she be cured. She's not going to snap out of it or even ever come to comprehend the importance or level of harm of the things she's done nor of the things she will do. The best thing for anyone in her circle would be to stay the hell away from her.
-leila
You know, I'm going to throw this up for others to chew on.
Why would Sarah Palin, if she was going to engage in a conspiracy of this magnitude, do something that would endanger all her well-laid plans? Why not announce the birth in a more low-key manner? What would be her motivations for doing this?
Apparently, there would have to something significant that was happening in Alaska at the time. That's the only reason. Some people would have me believe that Bristol Palin gave birth that day, and that's why her mother hurried home. However, the latest hypothesis from you folks contends that Bristol actually gave birth to Trig earlier than April, and gave birth to Tripp later than December. You hold onto this because the 8 months separating the two births destroys the notion of a faked pregnancy.
However, if Trig was actually born earlier, there would have been no real need to rush back to Alaska. She could have sauntered back there on her leisure. That casts doubt on the latter theory, which so far is not falsifiable.
So what was the motivation for flying so quickly back to Alaska? If Sarah Palin was trying to orchestrate a conspiracy of epic proportions, she certainly did not do go to great lengths not to call attention to herself.
So what do you think the motivation was? Feel free to answer.
You figure.
Maybe Levi will tell us tonite, or in his book if its publishede
Palin is a bit bonkers.
JC: Not knowing why she did or didn't do something is irrelevant to the question of who Trig's mother really is.
It is also possible he is not Bristol's and was adopted.
The only thing we know is that Palin's pregnancy changed in size and shape during her very brief "pregnancy" and that is NOT normal or even possible.
We know that all photos from jan -April 08 were scrubbed from the ADN and the Gov website. Why?
We know that she would not cooperate with the local paper that loved her, to clear this up,something she asked them to do.
Speculating on who the real mother is, is not the issue.
The issue is the LYING ex-half-term governor.
Jesse:
Probably SP did not "rush back" to Alaska from Texas. The trip had been planned this way because she didn't want to attend the social function after her speech. It was a good time with her out of state for the presentation of Trig to occur. The amnionic fluid leak was first disclosed by her father, but she confirmed it.
This was similar to the way they returned from Hong Kong. They don't seem to participate more than necessary in these functions. After posing for the picture with Andrea Gusty, she couldn't be seen again in Alaska without the big belly, so the Texas conference was a convenient time for the presentation of Trig.
I think both she and her husband are uncomfortable with people other than those of their own Wasilla high school set. So they pass on any social things where they would have to show interest in things like current affairs, books etc. Or chat about nothing at all, as we all do sometimes.
For example the president of the Alask Senate, Asked Sarah Palin would she like to share some of her plans and proposals for the coming legislative session in front of a bipartisan group of state senators on a retreat. According to several senators present, Sarah looked aroung the room and said "I feel like you guys are out to get me."
Katie Couric was out to get her by asking her what she read. Boy did that put a bee in Miss Sarahs bonnet. She was being insulted as a provincial.
Miss Wasilla is a bit paranoid.
Jesse, the "motivation" is that she is mentally ill.
What "motivates" her is not what motivates the majority of people, or rather, she has no innate, natural guilt or other "sensible" curbs on her "motivations".
=leila
P.S. When people are psychopaths, it doesn't mean that they can't function -somewhat. Ted Bundy was a convincing mid-level Republican party operative. OJ we all know about...
-leila
P.P.S.
The turkey scene mentioned above is exactly the sort of thing a psychopath would do.. intentionally "pardon" a turkey [a gesture w/o Alaskan precedent if I'm not mistaken, but patterning herself after Obama] in front of a process of bloody turkey throat-cutting. This, to a psychopath (I believe) would be not a "gaffe" borne of disattention but an hysterically funny joke played on all of you.
-leila
WV = "gleed"!
Her sense of humor. Example Trigs birth.
"The easiest pregnancy I ever had.
Darned tootin it was.
Trig <=> TRIsomy G
When I saw that, it really sent chills up my spine. [Not sure who pointed it out.. kudos to them, though]
=leila
WV = "phallasi"
A phallic fallacy!
P.S. (sorry for all the postscripts).. this is connected somewhat to her other kids' names.. Bristol, Piper and Willow are not bad, but "Track"? Because he was conceived on a track?? That is (imho) not cute, but sick. It reminds me of M. Jackson's "child".. Blanket. On HuffPo headline reports that he is "sad, shy". NO KIDDING. With a NAME like BLANKET!!?!?
GWB also f****d with people's names. I think that is a sign of such ultimate disrespect and contempt... Horrifying. When someone refuses to call you by your rightful name, it's an attempt at nullifying you. (That is just my 5-cent Lucy van Pelt assessment.)
=leila
TRIsomy G=Trig? I don't think they are that intelligent, do you?
I know palin did said she always wanted to name a boy Zamboni after the machine that polishes the ice in a rink.
The great Zamboni.
About the TRI-G? .. I dunno. I think certain "connections" can certainly be made in any person's head.. SP surely has a sort of bizzarro "cunning" intelligence, even if it's not the "normative" sort of intelligence one expects.
I would say "don't put anything past her" necessarily.
I mean, considering all we see laid out before us...!
-leila
Jesse-
Palin did not 'rush back'. She never planned on attending the nightime formal event, as she knew she could not wear her large overcoat to it. She wore large, thick coats indoors not to cover up what was there- but what was not there.
You always want references, links, etc...so I implore you to google to your heart's content and see for yourself that while Palin SAID to multiple people on numerous occasions "...so I had Todd change the flight..." when recounting her wee-hours amniotic rupture and alleged CBJ phone tag, she was one hundred percent, unequivocally lying.
If you'll care to do the research, you will see that the Alaska Air flights she took were the ONLY Texas-to-Anchorage flights that day. It would have been LITERALLY impossible to "reschedule" -- there was just the ONE flight. Nothing to reschedule TO or FROM.
What reason to you give for Palin saying so many times, even on audio/video interviews, that she had Todd "go ahead and change the flight to an earlier one"?
Palin knows her image, and she knew that the only plausible excuse for the storied 'hottest gov' in the US to miss the formal party during an event at which SHE was the darling, the 'draw' if you will -- was an 'emergency'. She could not very well go to a hospital in Texas; they would rightfully insist on examining a 7.75 month pregnant woman of advanced age whose infant is extremely I'll, right? Of course -- it would be a HUGE liability not to.
The only thing that would allow her to keep her ruse concealed -- was going into 'labour'...and promptly get her unpregnant arse OUT of Texas.
She 'rushed back' because she had no choice.
I urge you to offer your thoughts on her saying that she 'rescheduled' the flights -- thus proving that she never, ever intended on staying for the formal event, despite her claims of 'deciding' to leave early, 'having Todd change the plane tickets', etc. What are your thoughts?
Arrgh.. There ARE no "reasonings".. SP is psychopathic. The more I consider this the more likely it seems to me. Psychopaths are not necessarily all lurid serial killers, but they are people without guilt or remorse who MUST obtain what they want.. They can be irritable and short-sighted just as easily as they can be patient with long-sighted plans; in the end they create nothing but constant mayhem and chaos around them. Sound familiar to you all??
MAYHEM.
The reason that I have been investigating this of late is not at all because of SP, but because of issues with a family member who displays signs of a personality disorder. A clear diagnosis is not often obtained, and judgment is all-too-frequently withheld until "too late".
-leila
Ugh, "extremely ILL" ... NOT "extremely I'll"
stupid auto correct which I cannot figure out how to disable!
Just a few things. I'll try not to be too verbose.
First, Sarah Palin is not a psychopath or a sociopath. Unless we have some genuine psychiatrist here, then none of you should be making medical judgments.
Second, hannah, your theory doesn't stand up to basic scrutiny. You say Sarah Palin went back to Alaska to avoid a social function where she could wear a disguise? Why couldn't she wear a disguise? Would someone prevent her? Who? And if this was the case, why not simply not attend and go back to her hotel something? Who would stop her?
About rescheduling the flight, Sarah Palin could have simply meant she would have been rescheduling the flight from a later date to an earlier one. Even if she made small error there, it really doesn't prove anything except she misspoke. That happens to everyone.
To Barb Dwyer, from what I have see on on Pat Dougherty's own blogs, he took upon himself the initiative to write a story to put the rest these conspiracy theories. Sarah Palin didn't harass him about it.
It's complicated. All so complicated.
I have been told by a very good source that both Track and Levi helped push pills for Sherry at Wasilla High.
Just how much can Levi say without implicating himself? Or putting his mom at risk even more?
Post a Comment